SUPREME COURT, by Benjamin R. Twiss'34. Princeton University Press, 1942, 271 pp. $3.00.
I I ITS THIS REVIEWER NEVER had the privilege of knowing the late Ben Twiss who at the time of his tragic death at the age of a 8 was teaching political science at Hobart College. Judged by the uniform comment of those who knew him socially, his was a rare type of friendship to be highly prized. Judging by a reading of Mr. Twiss' posthumous volume it is apparent that the Dartmouth fellowship has lost a brilliant scholar who possessed a talent that was both solid and imaginative.
Lawyers and the Constitution is an exposition of the thesis "The development of law, whether written or unwritten, is primarily the work of the lawyer. It is the adoption by the judge of what is proposed at the bar." More specifically, Mr. Twiss has taken the work of the United States Supreme Court between 1890 and 1935, one of the most strongly conservative periods in the Court's history, and examined it in the light of this thesis. Analyzing in much detail the speeches, legal treatises and case briefs of some eight or ten of the most influential lawyers of the period Mr. Twiss first shows the close association that existed between the ideas held by these lawyers and the dominant conservative business philosophy of the day, and then proceeds to prove the considerable extent to which the Supreme Court drew upon these ideas in the rendering of the great constitutional decisions of the period.
Professor E. S. Corwin, the great professor of constitutional law at Princeton, prepared the volume for publication and also wrote a foreword for it. Dartmouth men will appreciate the high praise he bestows: "Ben's was a rare, an exhilarating nature, one which combined great gifts of mind and character with unusual charm of personality. As student, athlete, companion, and friend, he had won the love and admiration of hosts of his elders and of his contemporaries alike. In the presence of the world tragedy, so much of the weight of which falls upon the inexperienced shoulders of our young men, it is consoling to realize from this example that length of life is not always essential to completeness of living. Short as his life was, Ben Twiss lived successfully."