Freshmen 0—Harvard Freshmen 6
Somewhat handicapped by lack of experience on indoor courts, the 1925 tennis team went down to an overwhelming defeat at the hands of the Harvard freshmen. The Crimson quartet had everything its own way in the singles but were forced to three sets in both doubles matches.
Singles — Ingraham (H) defeated Osgood (D), 6—2, 6—3; Briggs (H) defeated Tourtellot (D), 6—1, 6—2; Dixon (H) defeated Emerson (D), 6—3, 6—2; Manning (H) defeated Van Orman (D), 6—4, 6—1.
Doubles — Ingraham and Dixon (H) defeated Osgood and Tourtellot (D), 5—7, 6—0, 6—3; Briggs and Bundy (H) defeated Emer son and Van Orman (D), 6—3, 3—6, 6—2.
Freshmen 4 — Exeter 2
Displaying a complete reversal of form from that which characterized their defeat at the hands of the Harvard freshmen, the yearling tennis team took Exeter into camp by a 4-2 score. Osgood, who was elected captain after the match, and Tourtellot found little difficulty with their opponents.
Singles — Osgood (D) defeated Smith (E), 6—4 6—4; Tourtellot (D) defeated Pitman (E), 6—4, 6—4; Perkins (E) defeated Emerson (D), 6—2 1—6, 6—3; Van Orman (D) defeated Collins (E), 6—4, 1—6, 9—7.
Doubles—Osgood and Tourtellot (D) defeated Smith and Ross (E), 6—2, 6—3; Pitman and Collins (E) defeated Emerson and Van Orman (D), 6—4, 6—1.
Freshmen 2—St. Paul's 4
Losing three of its singles matches and breaking even in the doubles, the Green freshmen sustained their second setback of the season in an unusually close match with St. Paul's at Concord. All but one of the six matches went to three sets.
Singles—Symington (P) defeated Osgood (£*)> 6—4, 3—6, 6—4; Tourtellot (D) debated Stewart (P), 6—4, 3—6, 6—4; Stewart (P) defeated Emerson (D), 6—4, 3—6, 6—4; Guest (P) defeated Matchett (D), 6—2, 6—4.
Doubles—Osgood and Tourtellot (D), de- feated Symington and Stewart (P), 5—7, 6—3, 6—3; Stewart and Deboise (P), defeated Emerson and Matchett (D), 7—5, 3—6, 6—4.